Download App
From Reform to Freedom: India’s Evolutionary Journey
Linkedin
During the latter part of the nineteenth century, Indian nationalism began to take root, with a shared sense of identity among Indians driving their efforts to challenge foreign rule. This pivotal period marked the commencement of the Indian freedom struggle, culminating in the attainment of independence. Delve into the captivating history of India’s journey towards liberation to gain a deeper understanding of this remarkable chapter.
Nationalism in India
Throughout its history, India has witnessed the rise and fall of various empires, such as the Mauryan Empire and the Mughal Empire, that brought the nation together under a common identity. This sense of unity persisted through the ages, even though centralized administrations often had short lifespans.
Following the decline of the Mughal Empire, India fragmented into numerous princely states. The downfall of the Mughal rule, facilitated to a great extent by the British, led to the establishment of the British Indian Empire, which exerted control over these princely states.
However, the majority of Indians harbored profound discontentment with this exploitative foreign dominion. Educated Indians came to recognize that the British prioritized their colonial interests, treating India merely as a market for their gains. This realization prompted them to advocate fervently for India’s political independence.
Establishment of the Indian National Congress (INC) in the year 1885
The latter part of the 19th century saw the rise of numerous political groups within British India. Among these, the Indian National Congress, established in 1885, stood out as the most prominent.
In its early days, the Congress Party aimed to provide a forum for civic and political discussions between Indians and the British authorities, with the goal of securing greater representation in the government for educated Indians.
However, with leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose, and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel at the helm, the Congress party later assumed a pivotal role in orchestrating mass movements against British rule.
Bengal Partition of 1905
Indian nationalism was experiencing a surge in influence, with Bengal emerging as its epicenter during the early 1900s.
During his tenure as Viceroy (1899-1905), Lord Curzon sought to diminish Calcutta’s role as the hub from which the Congress Party directed activities not only in Bengal but across India as a whole.
The idea of dividing Bengal into two parts had been circulating since December 1903.
From 1903 to mid-1905, the Congress party employed moderate strategies including petitions, memoranda, speeches, public gatherings, and media campaigns. Their objective was to sway public opinion in both India and England against the proposed partition.
Nonetheless, Viceroy Curzon officially declared the British Government’s intention to partition Bengal on July 19, 1905. The division was enacted on October 16, 1905.
The Swadeshi Movement (1905-1908)
The movement encompassed a spectrum ranging from conservative moderation to political extremism, spanning from acts of terrorism to the early inklings of socialism. It encompassed a variety of strategies, including petitions, public speeches, passive resistance, boycotts, and even more radical actions, all of which found their origins within this movement.
“Swadeshi” is formed by combining two Sanskrit words: “swa” (meaning “self”) and “desh” (meaning “country”).
The movement popularized the usage and consumption of locally made products, leading Indians to progressively forsake British goods in favor of indigenous alternatives.
During the Swadeshi Movement, a significant portion of Bengal’s urban and rural population, along with women and students, found themselves actively participating in politics for the first time. This movement didn’t remain confined to Bengal; its essence quickly permeated across the entire nation.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, Lajpat Rai, and Aurobindo Ghosh, prominent militant nationalists, were proponents of expanding the movement beyond Swadeshi and boycotts to a comprehensive political mass struggle throughout India. Their ultimate goal was to achieve self-rule, or “Swaraj.”
The Division within the Congress (1907)
The prominent figures leading the two factions, Tilak representing the Extremists and Gokhale representing the Moderates, were well aware of the perils posed by disunity within the nationalist movement.
In 1906, a potential division was averted by selecting Dadabhai Naoroji as the President of the Indian National Congress during the Calcutta session. Additionally, four compromise resolutions were adopted, addressing matters related to Swadeshi, Boycott, National Education, and Self-Government. Nevertheless, the aspiration for a unified Congress was short-lived.
While the Extremists aspired to expand the Swadeshi and Boycott Movement nationwide, the Moderates voiced their opposition.
Tensions escalated when rumors circulated that the Moderates aimed to undermine the four resolutions passed in Calcutta. This discord led to a schism during the Congress session held on December 26, 1907, in Surat, along the banks of the Tapti River.
The Indian National Congress underwent a split in December 1907. By this time, the Moderate nationalists had fulfilled their historical role, failing to adapt to the demands of the evolving phase of the national movement and unable to capture the attention of the younger generation.
Around the same juncture, revolutionary terrorism emerged in Bengal.
Socio-religious Transformations in India
Numerous socio-religious movements within British India not only brought about reforms among Indians but also played a pivotal role in fostering the growth of Indian nationalism. Explore further to gain insights into the diverse social and religious movements that catalyzed transformative changes in Indian society during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
The British introduction of modern education brought forth a wave of social and religious reform movements in India. Throughout the 1800s and 1900s, an increasing number of individuals came to appreciate Indian cultural values while also voicing their dissent against unfavorable aspects within it. This prompted the emergence of numerous leaders dedicated to reshaping Indian society. Their primary aspiration was to infuse modern ideals into the traditional fabric of Indian society.
For instance, Keshub Chandra Sen lamented, “What we observe today is a fallen nation – a nation whose once-great legacy now lies in ruins.”
Swami Vivekananda vividly depicted the prevailing conditions of Indians during that era, stating, “Scattered here and there, emaciated figures of the young and old, dressed in tattered rags, bearing on their faces the deeply etched lines of centuries of despair and poverty; ubiquitous cows, bullocks, and buffaloes – all with the same melancholic gaze, the same frail constitution; litter and filth lining the roadsides – this is the India we see today.”
Motivated by the desire to modernize their society in line with the demands of science, democracy, and nationalism, social leaders embarked on a journey to reform their traditional religions. This was crucial because religion held a fundamental role in people’s lives during that period, and significant social change was difficult without addressing religious reform.
Categorization of Transformative Social and Religious Movements in India
The socioreligious shifts in India can be examined from various perspectives.
One approach involves categorizing these movements by religion, yielding: (1) Hindu reform movements, (2) Muslim reform movements, (3) Sikh reform movements, and (4) Parsi reform movements.
Moreover, these organizations and movements can be further subdivided based on their geographical regions, namely: (1) movements in East India, (2) movements in West India, (3) movements in South India, and (4) movements in North India.
Reformative Movements within Hinduism in Western India (Maharashtra)
Religious reforms commenced in Bombay around 1840 through the efforts of Parmahans Mandali. Their objective was to combat idolatry and the caste system. Among the earliest religious reformers in western India was Gopal Hari Deshmukh, also known as ‘Lokahitwadi’, who penned his works in Marathi. He launched robust rational critiques against Hindu orthodoxy and advocated for religious as well as social equality.
The favorable facets of the socio-religious transformations in India
The religious reform movements of modern times shared an underlying coherence, primarily rooted in the principles of Reason (Rationalism) and Humanism. While occasionally drawing on faith and ancient authority to enhance their influence, these movements fundamentally rallied against the ritualistic, superstitious, irrational, and obscurantist aspects prevalent within Indian religion.
Swami Vivekananda once articulated, “Religion must vindicate itself through the discoveries of reason, just as every science does.”
Justice Ranade arrived at the realization that society, akin to a dynamic organism, is in perpetual evolution and cannot revert to the past.
Prominent reformers contended that modern concepts and culture could most effectively be absorbed by harmonizing them with the streams of Indian heritage.
Through religious reform movements, countless Indians were able to reconcile with the contemporary world. These movements paved the way for the rise of Indian nationalism and, eventually, the struggle for independence.
The unfavorable aspects of the socio-religious shifts in India
(1) Primarily, all of these movements served the needs of a narrow portion of society, specifically the urban middle and upper classes.
(2) The second limitation, which eventually transformed into a significant drawback, involved a tendency to embrace nostalgia, glorify past achievements, and rely heavily on scriptural authority. The emphasis on past greatness led to misplaced arrogance, while the inclination to idealize a ‘Golden Age’ in history hindered the complete embrace of modern science and impeded efforts to enhance the present.
The negative repercussions of this phenomenon became evident when it was realized that, parallel to the rapid growth of national awareness, another sentiment – communal consciousness – was taking root among the middle classes.
Various factors were undoubtedly accountable for the emergence of communalism in modern times; however, it’s undeniable that the nature of the religious reform movements also played a role in its development.
